Harvey Weinstein says the United States is trying to seize Michael Moore's new film on the U.S. Healthcare industry. Entitled Sicko, the film is premiering at Cannes this week.
"According to Weinstein, the US Treasury's moves meant 'we had to fly the movie to another country'- he would not say to where. 'Let the secret service find that out - though this is the same country that thought there were weapons of mass destruction, so they'll never find it.' He added that he feared that if the film were impounded, there might be attempts to cut some footage, in particular the last 20 minutes, which related to a trip to Cuba. This, said Weinstein, 'would not be good.'
In March, Moore travelled to the Caribbean island with a group of emergency workers from New York's Ground Zero to see whether they would receive better care under the Castro regime than they had under George Bush. He had applied for permission to travel in October 2006 and received no reply.
In a letter dated May 2, the treasury department notified Moore that it was investigating him for unlicensed travel to Cuba, or, as the missive put it, engaging in 'travel-related transactions involving Cuba'."
At Cannes,today, Mike Moore asks the question, "Why did you guys let him?" He was referring to the Australian public "letting" Prime Minister John Howard back Bush in the coalition to Iraq.
(Yes I know this is not directly related to your post. However.)
This stupid question, though completely noteworthy and justified, makes no acknowledgement whatsoever to the HUGE protest against the decision this dickhead leader made on our behalf. It's ignorant and arrogant and I'm disappointed to be met once again with that, from a Yank I like.
It makes no reference to the Labor (left) Opposition leader's comments at the time, that John Howard was one in a long congo line of "ARSELICKERS" to Washington.
A more intelligent question would be, "Why does a country of 20 million people, in a land mass the size of the U.S. continue to be dominated and intimidated by the American and British governments?"
Or this: "Why is it that after an odd 200 years of white presence, and 40,000 years of black, does Australia still see fit to allow domination by a country who continues to bully everyone on the planet, including it's "allies"?
Why do American governments never stop throwing their weight around?
Having said that, it's a good point, and I agree this country's leader should have done what Canada's did. This is a young, old country.
One really has to know a whole lot more about it's history and it's current and past underground voices to make a comment like that. Obviously, Mike Moore doesn't.
Posted by: Alison Tuck | Wednesday, May 23, 2007 at 06:42 AM